ntk wrote:I think there is a mistake in your stats
I think that you may have interpreted differently. Those are not to glorify top players, but only to show the evolution of the scores. How a 1500 now is not as prestigious as a 1500 months ago.
Moreover I did not do the delta on the top1 because the top1 may be just idle or not so active and just retain the score (and it was the case several times), while in the top5 there is always movement. Then having the top5 delta I decided to do the top20 delta instead of the top10.
But then, one can see whatever in the stats, I cannot force on you a certain interpretation.
And yes the problem of matching strong vs "not so good" exist, but is also true that (a) the strong one will get only one point - compared to -20 if he loses, so the contribution is marginal, and (b) we have unavoidable tournaments to see who is the strongest
. In the tournament who plays a little has mostly no chances to succeed, unless the others play a little too or are horribly losing. It is by design.
If you want to prove that you are the strongest, play for the tournament (as I did, but I lost to blitz and mcompany)
http://www.reddit.com/r/Gladiabots/wiki/players/pier4r_nvidia_shield_k1 -> Gladiabots CHAT, stats, insights and more ;